Is sugar Toxic?

(CBS News) If you are what you eat, then what does it mean that the average American consumes 130 pounds of sugar a year? Sanjay Gupta reports on new research showing that beyond weight gain, sugar can take a serious toll on your health, worsening conditions ranging from heart disease to cancer. Some physicians go so far as to call sugar a toxin.


The following script is from “Sugar” which aired on April 1, 2012. Dr. Sanjay Gupta is the correspondent. Denise Schrier Cetta and Sumi Aggarwal, producers.

The chances are good that sugar is a bigger part of your daily diet than you may realize which is why our story tonight is so important. New research coming out of some of America’s most respected institutions is starting to find that sugar, the way many people are eating it today, is a toxin and could be a driving force behind some of this country’s leading killers, including heart disease.

As a result of these findings, an anti-sugar campaign has sprung up, led by Dr. Robert Lustig, a California endocrinologist, who believes the consumption of added sugars has plunged America into a public health crisis.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Is sugar toxic?

Dr. Robert Lustig: I believe it is.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Do you ever worry that that’s– it just sounds a little bit over the top?

Dr. Robert Lustig: Sure. All the time. But it’s the truth.

Dr. Robert Lustig is a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of California, San Francisco and a pioneer in what is becoming a war against sugar.

Motivated by his own patients — too many sick and obese children – Dr. Lustig has concluded that sugar, more than any other substance, is to blame.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: What are all these various diseases that you say are linked to sugar?

Dr. Robert Lustig: Obesity, type II diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease itself.

Lustig says the American lifestyle is killing us.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: And most of it you say is preventable?

Dr. Robert Lustig: Seventy-five percent of it is preventable.

While Dr. Lustig has published a dozen scientific articles on the evils of sugar, it was his lecture on YouTube, called “Sugar: The Bitter Truth,” that brought his message to the masses.

[YouTube Video: I'm standing here today to recruit you in the war against bad food.]

By “bad food” Dr. Lustig means the obvious things such as table sugar, honey, syrup, sugary drinks and desserts, but also just about every processed food you can imagine, where sugar is often hidden: yogurts and sauces, bread, and even peanut butter. And what about the man-made, often vilified sweetener, high fructose corn syrup?

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Is it worse than just table sugar?

Dr. Robert Lustig: No. ‘Cause it’s the exact same. They are basically equivalent. The problem is they’re both bad. They’re both equally toxic.

Since the 1970s, sugar consumption has gone down nearly 40 percent, but high fructose corn syrup has more than made up the difference. Dr. Lustig says they are both toxic because they both contain fructose — that’s what makes them sweet and irresistible.

Dr. Robert Lustig: We love it. We go out of our way to find it. I think one of the reasons evolutionarily is because there is no food stuff on the planet that has fructose that is poisonous to you. It is all good. So when you taste something that’s sweet, it’s an evolutionary Darwinian signal that this is a safe food.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: We were born this way?

Dr. Robert Lustig: We were born this way.

Central to Dr. Lustig’s theory is that we used to get our fructose mostly in small amounts of fruit — which came loaded with fiber that slows absorption and consumption — after all, who can eat 10 oranges at a time? But as sugar and high fructose corn syrup became cheaper to refine and produce, we started gorging on them. Americans now consume 130 pounds per person a year — that’s a third of a pound every day.

Dr. Lustig believes those sweeteners are helping fuel an increase in the most deadly disease in America: heart disease. For years, he’s been a controversial voice.

[Kimber Stanhope: Here is our oral isotope...]

But now, studies done by Kimber Stanhope, a nutritional biologist at the University of California, Davis are starting to back him up. She’s in the middle of a groundbreaking, five-year study which has already shown strong evidence linking excess high fructose corn syrup consumption to an increase in risk factors for heart disease and stroke. That suggests calories from added sugars are different than calories from other foods.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: The mantra that you hear from most nutritionists is that a calorie is a calorie is a calorie.

Kimber Stanhope: And I think the results of the study showed clearly that is not true.

Stanhope’s conclusions weren’t easy to come by. Nutrition studies are expensive and difficult. Stanhope has paid groups of research subjects to live in this hospital wing for weeks at a time, under a sort of 24-hour lockdown. They undergo scans and blood tests – every calorie they ingest, meticulously weighed and prepared.

Kimber Stanhope: They’re never out of our sight. So we do know that they are consuming exactly what we need them to consume.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: And they’re not sneaking any candy bars on the side.

Kimber Stanhope: Yeah, right, exactly.

For the first few days, participants eat a diet low in added sugars, so baseline blood levels can be measured.

[Research assistant: So remember you guys have to finish all of your Kool-Aid. ]

Then, 25 percent of their calories are replaced with sweetened drinks and Stanhope’s team starts drawing blood every 30 minutes around the clock. And those blood samples? They revealed something disturbing.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: And what are you starting to see?

Kimber Stanhope: We found that the subjects who consumed high fructose corn syrup had increased blood levels of LDL cholesterol and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: How quickly did these changes occur?

Kimber Stanhope: Within two weeks.

Kimber Stanhope’s study suggests that when a person consumes too much sweet stuff, the liver gets overloaded with fructose and converts some of it into fat. Some of that fat ends up in the bloodstream and helps generate a dangerous kind of cholesterol called small dense LDL. These particles are known to lodge in blood vessels, form plaque and are associated with heart attacks.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Did it surprise you when you first got these results back?

Kimber Stanhope: I would have to say I was surprised because when I saw our data, I started drinking and eating a whole lot less sugar. I would say our data surprised me.

So imagine, for these healthy young people, drinking a sweetened drink might be just as bad for their hearts as the fatty cheeseburgers we’ve all been warned about since the 1970s. That’s when a government commission mandated that we lower fat consumption to try and reduce heart disease.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: So with the best of intentions, they say, “Time to reduce fat in the American diet?”

Dr. Robert Lustig: Exactly. And we did. And guess what? Heart disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetes and death are skyrocketing.

Dr. Lustig believes that’s primarily because we replaced a lot of that fat with added sugars.

Dr. Robert Lustig: Take the fat out of food, it tastes like cardboard. And the food industry knew that. So they replaced it with sugar.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: This idea that sugar increases this particularly bad LDL, the small dense particles that are associated with heart disease. Do most doctors– do they know this?

Dr. Robert Lustig: No, they do not know this. This is new.

And it turns out, sugar has become a major focus in cancer research too. Lewis Cantley, is looking at the connection.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: If you limit your sugar you decrease your chances of developing cancer?

Lewis Cantley: Absolutely.

Cantley, a Harvard professor and the head of the Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, says when we eat or drink sugar, it causes a sudden spike in the hormone insulin, which can serve as a catalyst to fuel certain types of cancers.

Lewis Cantley: What we’re beginning to learn is that insulin can cause adverse effects in the various tissues. And of particular concern is cancer.

Why? Nearly a third of some common cancers — including breast and colon cancers — have something called insulin receptors on their surface. Insulin binds to these receptors and signals the tumor to start consuming glucose.

Lewis Cantley: This is your body…

Every cell in our body needs glucose to survive. But the trouble is, these cancer cells also use it to grow.

Lewis Cantley: So if you happen to have the tumor that has insulin receptors on it then it will get stimulated to take up the glucose that’s in the bloodstream rather than go into fat or muscle, the glucose goes into the tumor. And the tumor uses it to grow.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: So you’ve just seen that tumor turn blue which is essentially reflective of glucose going into it.

Lewis Cantley: That’s right.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: So these cancers, much in the same way that muscle will say, “Hey, I’d like some of that glucose, the fat says, “I would like some of that glucose,” the cancers have learned how to do this themselves as well?

Lewis Cantley: Yes. So they have evolved the ability to hijack that flow of glucose that’s going by in the bloodstream into the tumor itself.

Lewis Cantley’s research team is working on developing drugs that will cut off the glucose supply to cancer cells and keep them from growing. But until there’s a breakthrough, Cantley’s advice? Don’t eat sugar. And if you must, keep it to a minimum.

Lewis Cantley: In fact– I– you know, I live my life that way. I rarely eat sugar.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: When you see a sugary drink or if I were to offer you one, what– with all that you know, what’s going through your mind?

Lewis Cantley: I probably would turn it down and get a glass of water.

But for most of us, that’s easier said than done…

Eric Stice: It turns out sugar is much more addictive than I think we had sort of realized early on.

Eric Stice, a neuroscientist at the Oregon Research Institute, is using functional MRI scanners to learn how our brains respond to sweetness.

Eric Stice: Sugar activates our brain in a special way. That’s very reminiscent of, you know, drugs like cocaine.

That’s right. Cocaine.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Let’s give it a shot…

I climbed into the MRI scanner to see how my brain would respond. That’s a straw that’s been rigged to deliver a tiny sip of soda into my mouth.

Eric Stice: Stay as still as you can, ok?

Just as it hit my tongue, the scanner detected increased blood rushing to certain regions of my brain. In these images, the yellow areas show that my reward region is responding to the sweet taste. Dopamine – a chemical that controls the brain’s pleasure center – is being released, just as it would in response to drugs or alcohol.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: So dopamine is released. That sort of makes me feel good. I’m experiencing some pleasure from having this Coke.

Eric Stice: Right, that euphoric effect.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: So far be it for people to realize this ’cause sugar is everywhere, but you’re saying this is one of the most addictive substances possibly that we have?

Eric Stice: It certainly is very good at firing the reward regions in our brain.

Eric Stice says by scanning hundreds of volunteers, he’s learned that people who frequently drink sodas or eat ice cream or other sweet foods may be building up a tolerance, much like drug users do. As strange as it sounds, that means the more you eat, the less you feel the reward. The result: you eat more than ever.

Eric Stice: If you overeat these on a regular basis it causes changes in the brain that basically it blunts your reward region response to the food, so then you eat more and more to achieve the same satisfaction you felt originally.

With all this new science emerging, we wanted to hear from the sugar industry, so we visited Jim Simon, who’s on the board of the Sugar Association, at a sugar cane farm in Louisiana.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Would it surprise you that almost every scientist that we talked to in researching this story told us they are eliminating all added sugars. They’re getting rid of it because they’re concerned about the health impacts.

Jim Simon: To say that the American consuming public is going to completely omit, eliminate, sweeteners out of their diet I don’t think gets us there.

Simon cautions that eliminating sugar wrongly vilifies one food, rather than working towards the long-term solution of reducing calories and exercising.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: You know, a lot of people, Jim, are saying that sugar is different. That it is bad for your heart and is causing a lot of the problems we’re talking about. It is addictive and in some cases might even fuel cancers. What would you – I mean you’ve looked at this. You must have looked at some of these studies. What do you say about that?

Jim Simon: The science is not completely clear here.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: But some of that’s, but some of these studies exist. I mean, what is a consumer, what are they to make of all that?

Jim Simon: Well, I would say to them, that they’ve got to approach, their diet in balance.

Dr. Robert Lustig agrees — we need a balanced diet — but his idea of balance is a drastic reduction in sugar consumption. To that end he co-authored an American Heart Association report recommending men should consume no more than 150 calories of added sugars a day. And women, just 100 calories. That’s less than the amount in just one can of soda.

Dr. Robert Lustig: Ultimately this is a public health crisis. And when it’s a public health crisis, you have to do big things and you have to do them across the board. Tobacco and alcohol are perfect examples. We have made a conscious choice that we’re not going to get rid of them, but we are going to limit their consumption. I think sugar belongs in this exact same wastebasket.

Got Bitters? Find out why they are Essential to a Healthy Diet

ImageBitter herbs have been traced back to the beginning of time.  The bible mentions the use of bitter herbs in the Old Testament.  The bitter herbs served as a reminder of the embittered slavery experienced by Jews in Ancient Egypt.

It fascinates me though, that these bitters were and still are exceptional for our health.  At home I make an organic blood and liver cleans using Dandelion, Burdock root and Milk Thistle.  I also toss a few bitters into our smoothies and soups for added benefit and for our toddler to enjoy the benefits of a nutritious green smoothie. What most people are not aware of is that a diet containing a balanced amount of bitters helps the body’s overall digestion, helps the body absorb certain vitamins more efficiently, assists with reflux, normalizes our blood sugar and the list goes on and on.

Below is a great article on the subject of bitters.  Hope you enjoy it!  Got a comment or question?  Feel free to post a comment below.

Blessed Bitters

In medicinal herbcraft, we sometimes
speak of the “actions” of
herbs. Most herb books will have
a section listing such properties as
anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic,
hepatic, alterative, diuretic, tonic and
a plethora of other words both familiar
and obscure. But while these terms
are all grouped together, some actions
are far more telling than others. For
example, saying that an herb is “anti inflammatory”
seems useful, since it indicates what the herb is used for.

But it tells us nothing of how the plant
achieves this end; it tells us nothing of
the herb’s essential nature.
Why is the plant anti-inflammatory?
Is it aromatic, containing volatile
oils? Is it rich in antioxidant flavinoids?
Is it astringent?

It is these actions that provide a foundational understanding of traditional herbcraft,
for in these properties the plants speak to us of their virtues. A
plant’s scent is its language. Its color communicates. In its flavor
it speaks to us.
Among the most pervasive flavors found in healing herbs
is that of bitterness. Isn’t it interesting that this flavor, so widespread
and variant in so many of our most trusted remedies, is an
unfamiliar one to us? One that people often claim deters them
from plant medicines? If plants’ tongues speak to our tongues,
then what do we not hear when we taste no bitterness?

Bitter Deficiency Syndrome


Bitters are imperative; everyone needs some bitters in their diet.
No traditional culture could have imagined a diet virtually (if
not absolutely) devoid of any bitter foods—as we seem to have
established in most modern diets. This is not to say that one
should force themselves to eat a bowl of raw dandelion roots,
but to posit that the “medicinal” actions associated with bitters
might be viewed in an entirely different light.
I am a firm believer in Bitter Deficiency Syndrome; a notion
that posits that much of the health woes faced by modern
folk has at its root a lack of bitter flavor in the diet; and that
many of the digestive problems for which we see bitters as a
“remedy” are actually symptoms of deficiency of this flavor.
Perhaps it is not right to think that bitters should be used to
treat sluggish digestion, but that a lack of bitter flavor in one’s
diet can be a cause of sluggish digestion. Perhaps many of the
conditions calling for bitters as a remedy arise from their omission,
not unlike rickets arises from a lack of vitamin D.

I was first introduced to the idea of bitter deficiency syndrome
by James Green, who wrote in The Male Herbal:
It is my opinion that the nearly complete lack of bitter
flavored foods in the overall U.S. and Canadian diet is a
major contributing factor to common cultural health imbalances
such as PMS, other female and male sexual organ
dysfunctions, hormonal imbalances, migraine headache,
indigestion, liver and gall bladder dysfunction, abnormal
metabolism, hypoglycemia, diabetes, etc.
As the years have passed since I initially read this, I have
come to agree more and more fervently with this notion, seeing
firsthand the restorative actions of dietary bitters. To better
understand the notion of bitter deficiency syndrome, let us
look at the scope of bitter’s virtues.

A Flavor and an Action
One cannot separate the taste of bitterness from its medicine.
Though as with all things there are exceptions, it can be broadly
stated that by simply tasting bitterness in an herb, one can immediately
know a number of the plant’s virtues. Should one not
taste the plant’s bitterness (perhaps the plant is trapped inside
a capsule), the actions of the plant will not fully manifest. Its
potential is masked with its flavor.
What is it that bitters do? It is often summarized that bitters
stimulate digestive secretions and the metabolism as a
whole, and in so doing increase appetite, relieve constipation,
and generally ease the heavy glumness of sluggish digestion.
But, this is really too simple and cursory a summation, and a
deeper look into the actions of bitters is not only theoretically
insightful but practically invaluable.

The Scope of Bitters

Bitters stimulate all digestive secretions: saliva, acids, enzymes,
hormones, bile, and so forth. Each of these acts as a solvent to
break down food for absorption, and the quantity and quality
of these fluids ensure proper nutrition. Inadequate production
of these secretions is common in modern cultures (i.e. cultures
lacking bitters in their diet), and the implications of such deficiencies
are myriad.
When first tasted, bitters promote salivation, which begins
the process of digestion by breaking down starches and beginning
to work on fats. Taste receptors in the mouth (there are
over twenty-five different bitter taste receptors) recognize the
presence of bitters, and trigger a system-wide reaction throughout
the digestive tract.

In the stomach, sufficient hormones, acids, and enzymes
are needed to help break down proteins and carbohydrates,
and to free up minerals for assimilation. Bitters stimulate the
secretion of the hormone gastrin, which regulates the production
of gastric acid. Inadequate stomach acid will prevent the
uptake of minerals, which will in turn rob the body of essential
nutrition needed for wellness (even if those nutrients are being
consumed as foods or supplements). Low acid also weakens
stomach tissues, and is often the foundational cause of esophageal
reflux (though most people mistakenly believe they have
too much acid). It is well known that as people pass into their
elder years, they produce less stomach acid. This is sometimes
remedied by taking supplemental hydrochloric acid, but it
makes far more sense to restore bitters to the diet, which will
allow the body to produce its own acid, rather than relying on a
supplement and allowing bitter deficiency to continue. Bitters
also increase production of the enzymes pepsin, which helps
break down proteins, and intrinsic factor, which is essential for
the absorption of vitamin B12, which has far-reaching effects
ranging from blood building to neurological function.

Bitters act on both the pancreas and liver/gall bladder,
helping to normalize blood sugar and promote the production
and release of pancreatic enzymes and bile, which ensure good
digestion of fats and oils. A healthy flow of bile helps rid the
liver of waste products, prevents the formation of gallstones,
and emulsifies lipids, which the pancreatic enzymes then break
down along with proteins and carbohydrates for absorption
in the small intestine. Bile also provides lubrication for the
intestines, helping to facilitate the passage of digested food.
Deficient bile and sluggish liver/gall bladder function can lead
to dryness in the intestines, which is often a cause of chronic
constipation. Bitters also promote secretion of digestive juices
within the small intestine, further aiding bowel transit and nutrient
assimilation. New Mexican herbalist Kiva Rose adds:
In close relationship to the effects on both the liver and
pancreas, bitter herbs and foods can often dramatically
help the irritability, bloating, moodiness, and digestive upset
of PMS.
In addition to the action of bitters on digestive secretions,
they also strengthen the tone of tissues throughout the digestive
tract, as well as aid in the healing of damaged mucous
membranes. This helps resolve conditions ranging from gastroesophageal
reflux to ulcers to leaky gut syndrome. Peristalsis,
the wavelike contractions of muscles lining the digestive
organs is likewise enhanced, helping move digestate through
and out of the body.
All these actions, taken together, can have a net result of restoring
appetite, indicating bitters for loss of appetite resulting
from causes ranging from chronic indigestion to illness to anorexia
nervosa. On the other end of the spectrum, bitters also
seem to be very useful when addressing cravings, particularly of  sweets.

I believe the craving our minds feel for sweets is literally
the craving our bodies have for bitters. In their natural
form, most sweet flavors are associated with some degree of
bitterness (sweet foods and herbs such as pure sugarcane, licorice
root, and stevia all possess some bitterness). Any bitter flavor,
though, is removed entirely when sugars are refined. Our
bodies evolved with this association and they still remember it;
hence, sweet cravings are a way our bodies have of asking us for
bitters, and they can often be sated by tasting things that are
bitter. Cravings need not be relegated to food, however.

Small doses of many bitter herbs can be very helpful for cravings associated
with many addictions, due to their calming effect on
mood (elaborated on below). An example of this is the chewing
of calamus root to ease the cravings for tobacco.
Traditional herbalism in cultures throughout the world
consider bitters to have a “downward” action. This refers not
only to bitters more readily perceived digestive actions (including
their admirable efficacy in resolving bad breath arising
from the gut), but also to their more esoteric virtues.
Bitters tend to be grounding, helping to strengthen one’s
connection to instinct. They help to shift people from intellectual
“brain” energy (which looks at things, takes them apart,
and sees the pieces) to gut energy (which reacts to things instinctually,
independent of intellectual consideration). An example
of this might be when a person meets someone, and
initially gets a bad vibe for them, but then goes on a head trip
about how they’re being judgmental and how they’re probably
projecting and they’re going to let go of their preconceptions . . .
only to discover (time and again) after doing so that their gut was
right in the first place.
Bitters also help people return to present moment reality.
In “not here” situations, bitters will help bring someone from
wherever they’re “at” back to the present. This has to do with
the head/gut dynamic as well. Head energy is notoriously “not
present;” rather, the person’s consciousness exists where their
thoughts are. A taste of bitter helps to reground a person to
the present.
British herbalist Sarah Head has called the bitter flavor of
bitters “releasing.” Reaching beyond the physiological release
of gastrointestinal (GI) fluids, we can see that they help one let
go of stuck energy—particularly anger and frustration—emotions
often viewed in traditional medicine as being tied to stagnant/
sluggish liver energy. Bitters, in addition to releasing bile,
also help people let go of the emotional energies housed in
different organs.
This correlation between bitters and mood may seem to
some speculative or even spurious, but here there is abundant
rational evidence to support the assertions (for those who are
stuck in their head energy). The gastrointestinal system, as a
whole, houses the enteric nervous system (ENS), a part of the
autonomic nervous system that controls the involuntary goings-
on of digestion.

But this isn’t the only role played by the
ENS. Many people are surprised to discover that the brunt
of mood-related hormones and neurotransmitters, including
serotonin, dopamine, endorphins, and benzodiazepines, are
produced not primarily in the brain, but in the gut by the
enteric nervous system. So, if your metabolism is deficient,
and the GI tract has to deal with the problems that come
along with deficiency, wouldn’t it seem reasonable that something
we know perks up GI functions (bitters) might perk up
the production of mood-related hormones as well? This seems
especially likely when we consider that we know bitters stimulate
the production of the hormone gastrin, and the action of
serotonin in the gut, which is to calm irritation, and promote
peristalsis and digestive secretions. Practically speaking, bitters
do indeed serve as excellent calmatives and often can banish
depression correlated with digestive deficiencies.

So, to summarize, we see that bitters possess a corrective
influence over sluggish metabolism, deficient stomach acid,
and bile secretion resulting in difficulty digesting fats, oils, and
proteins, nutrient deficiency, loss of appetite, cravings, addictions,
ungroundedness, anxiety, depression, and other conditions
that are rampant in our culture. That these conditions
are among the most frequently medicated, using both over the
counter and prescription drugs, underscores the merit of using
bitter plants.
Contraindications and Considerations
Bitters are considered “cold” in energy in traditional herbcraft,
and long-term or heavy use is said to “cool the digestion,”
something not seen as desirable. This doesn’t mean their use
should be avoided, but that they can benefit from combining
them with a warming herb (ginger, for example), or by the use
of bitters that are also warming (like calamus or angelica).
Another consideration is that if a person is frequently bothered
by intestinal gas, pungent, aromatic, “carminative” herbs
(such as fennel, orange peel, chamomile, or anise) should be
added, as the volatile oils they contain possess a dispersive effect
and their use helps to expel gas.
Bitters are also said to be drying, because the increased secretions
they stimulate remove fluids from the body.
Some bitters, such as fenugreek, also provide moisture to address this aspect.
These considerations regarding bitters are easily addressed
by combining bitters with other herbs in a formula, or by using
those bitters that are also warming, aromatic, or moistening.
Also, such issues are most pertinent when using more overtly
medicinal bitters, as opposed to nutrient-rich foods which possess
a bitter flavor.
Bitter Foods and Bitter Medicines
The quality of a plant’s bitterness is widely variable in both
character and degree. Many bitter herbs are more accurately
referred to as foods, while others are decidedly medicinal in
their action. Bitter foods should be considered essential to
good nutrition, whereas bitters of a more medicinal nature
should be reserved to address specific concerns not remedied
by dietary bitters.
How can you discern between dietary and medicinal bitters?
Primarily by whether the plant can be considered a food
you can easily eat. Dietary bitters consist of many incredibly
nutritious leafy greens. The very notion of having salad before
a meal originates from the role of the bitter greens that
were once the mainstay of salads. Indeed, salad wasn’t always
chopped iceberg lettuce and fatty dressings, but used to be made
from wild leafy herbs such as dandelion and chicory, or many
of the common weeds that naturally spring up around human
habitations.

These nutrient-rich herbs were complemented by
vinegar dressings, which also serve to extract their minerals for
optimal absorption. A salad of this nature not only serves as a
nutritious appetizer, but also aids in the digestion of heavier
foods, which often make up the “main course” of meals.
Medicinal bitters are too powerful in flavor to make useful
foods. Few indeed (even me) would care to sit down to a soufflé
of gentian roots, or replace their tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus)
with wormwood (Artemisia absinthium). Such herbs are
appropriately used to address a particular need, be it chronic
indigestion or that heavy, stuffed feeling that often follows liberal
holiday feasting.
Using Bitters in Food and Medicine
So how does one go about introducing bitters into their diet?
Initially, by the gradual inclusion of bitter foods, which include
a slew of immensely nutritious greens, high in vitamins, minerals
and other nutrients we don’t yet value enough. When making
your next salad, try adding some of the many bitter greens,
available either from your own healthily neglected lawn or
even many supermarkets. Arugula, watercress, endive, radicchio,
and various mustard greens can be found at many groceries
these days, either on their own or in herb or “spring mixes.”
Even better, dandelion, chicory, and other weedy plants will
grow of their own accord in your yard (without any work from
you) if you let them—wild bitter greens abound.
Likewise, such greens can be used to top sandwiches or
garnish familiar dishes. I often top pasta with a blend of slivered
dandelion leaves and sesame and ground flax seeds, and
have been known to bring in a small bag of bitter leaves to replace
the sad looking lettuce restaurants place atop a sandwich.

Stir fries are spruced up by such greens, thrown in shortly before
serving, and pestos can even be made more nutritious and
palatable by blending such plants as garlic mustard in with the
basil.
A few considerations are worthy of mentioning. If the bitter
flavor is new to you, and seems more agreeable to your brain
than your palate, ease bitters into your dietary repertoire. Taste
different bitters individually to see which one’s you like best, and
blend them into a salad consisting of milder or sweeter greens
(including other wild plants, such as chickweed or violet leaves).
You needn’t clobber yourself over the tongue with their flavor;
just add enough to sense their bite.
Acids generally complement both the flavor and effects of
bitters. As mentioned above, vinegar can be used as a dressing
on salads, and will both mellow the flavor and aid in the assimilation
of minerals. Ginger in a dressing will also “warm up”
the flavor. A splash of lemon juice, or the addition of sun-dried
tomatoes, can likewise make bitter greens more palatable. Fats,
spices, and a bit of sea salt also help balance and enhance the
bitters’ bite.
Although initially an unfamiliar taste you may feel an aversion
to, you’ll probably find that the body quickly recognizes
the essential nature of bitters. After using them a bit, the brain
registers that the body is reacting to them in an “Oh, finally”
manner. Once we feel them satiate a craving we’ve long nursed
and tried unsuccessfully to fill with something else, it clicks.
The use of medicinal bitters often requires more consideration,
though there are a number of simple indications for their
use. Most simple, acute indigestion can be allayed by a small
dose of bitters; 15 to 30 drops of a bitter tincture will relieve the
slow, stuffed, stagnant feeling that comes with too-liberal feasting.
In fact, the addition of Angostura bitters to champagne
is intended to do just that. For more developed or chronic
health concerns, greater discernment is required when choosing
which herbs to use, and further study or the insights of a
knowledgeable herbalist are likely warranted.
Bitter tinctures can be made simply by soaking chopped
dandelion or yellow dock roots in vodka in a mason jar for a
few weeks, or they can be formulated from several plants for
a broader action. I make a tincture blend of gentian and orange
peel spiced with a bit of ginger, which tastes quite nice
and works equally well. A blend of roasted and raw dandelion
root could be used as a more readily available substitution for
the gentian. Small quantities of tea can also be used; and, in
fact, the familiar and tasty chamomile, if made by steeping an
ounce of the dried flowers in a quart of water just off the boil
overnight, yields a potent brew, both bitter and aromatic. Such
a strong infusion can be taken in an ounce or so as a dose,
with the excess frozen in ice cube trays and thawed as needed
to lessen the task of daily tea making. It’s worth noting that
bitters that are also diaphoretic, such as chamomile, will favor
sweating over GI effects when drunk hot, and so best consumed
lukewarm, cool, or cold.

The Bitter End
What seems to us as bitter trials are often blessings in disguise.
~Oscar Wilde

While not referring to the taste of plants, this sentiment holds
true when applied to them. People associated bitterness with
negative virtues such as spite and resentment, and yet, what
emotional bitterness really originates from is stagnation; the
inability to release a belief or feeling that no longer serves,
but rather hinders, our wellness, development, and growth.
The bitter person is oppressed by avoidance of the very thing
they cannot let go. Only by embracing bitterness can we learn
what it has to offer—to teach us. In this embrace we find it
rich in medicine.
As it applies to herbs, these same factors resonate. We
avoid bitterness because its taste seems uncomfortable; it
challenges us. And yet when embraced, we find what it offers
us is an abundance of medicine, which allows us to escape
from a state of stagnation and release those things, both
physiological and emotional, that hinder the blossoming of
our wellness.
References
Breakspear, Ian. “The Bitters.” Client Handout. 2005.
Garner-Wizard, Mariann. “HerbClip™ Bitters: Their History,
Conceptual Context, and Health Benefits.” Retrieved online
at http://content.herbalgram.org/wholefoodsmarket/
HerbClip/pdfs/020442-258.pdf on September 10, 2008.
Green, James. The Male Herbal: Health Care for Men and Boys.
California: The Crossing Press, 1991.
Hardin, Kiva Rose. “The Medicine Woman’s Roots Terms of
the Trade 4: Bitters.” Retrieved on September 10, 2008,
online at http://bearmedicineherbals.com/?p=404.
Head, Sarah. “Bitters: Herbs which promote release?” Retrieved
on September 13, 2008, online at

http://kitchenherbwife.blogspot.com/2008/07/bittersherbs-

which-promote-release.html.
Hoffmann, David. Medical Herbalism: The Science and Practice of
Herbal Medicine. Vermont: Healing Arts Press, 2003.
^ Blessed Bitters & 153
Hoffmann, David. Healthy Digestion: A Natural Approach to Relieving
Indigestion, Gas, Heartburn, Constipation, Colitis &
More. Massachusetts: Storey Publishing, LLC, 2000.
“Herbwifery Forum: Bitters.” Retrieved online at http://
herbwifery.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=272 on September
14, 2008.
King, Dr. Rosalyn M. “The Enteric Nervous System: The
Brain in the Gut.” Retrieved on September 8, 2008, online
at http://www.psyking.net/id36.htm.
154 ^ Blessed Bitters &

Article by Jim McDonald

Pasteurized milk 150 times more contaminated with blood, pus and feces than fresh milk

The CDC has put out a stunning piece of propaganda attacking fresh milk (raw dairy), claiming it is “150 times more dangerous” than pasteurized milk.

But what the CDC won’t dare reveal to the public is the far more horrifying truth: Pasteurized dairy is produced in the dirtiest milk factories imaginable, where blood, pus, e.coli and other truly dangerous pathogens are routinely bottled into milk containers and fed to consumers.

That’s the whole point of pasteurization, you see: To kill everything that might be alive in their ultra-dirty milk. The real purpose of pasteurization is not to simply “make milk safe” as is claimed by the CDC, but rather to allow the dairy industry to operate DIRTY. It’s so much easier to just cook the crap out of the milk (yes, there’s fecal matter in it) than to clean up their operations, get it?

Thanks to pasteurization, conventional (non-organic, non-raw) dairy operators have no need to thoroughly wash their milking machines, no need to sterilize any milk containers, no need to wash their hands, and no need to maintain a clean milking environment whatsoever. It’s just total filth with festering diseased animals dying on the floor and being physically abused by the corporate dairy operators (see video links, below).

Dairy cows are routinely abused and left to suffer in total filth

Want to know how conventional (pasteurized) dairy cows are really treated? Here’s something the CDC won’t show you.

Watch this highly disturbing video of dairy cows being kicked, tortured, abused and injured by conventional dairy workers. This was filmed with an undercover spy cam (WARNING: DISTURBING IMAGERY):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUmtSONLhOc

When you buy pasteurized milk at the grocery store, you are supporting an industry that tortures cows and produces a dirty, filthy product!

Of course, the dairy industry would much rather force everybody to pasteurize their milk and outlaw clean raw dairy than to clean up their own act. That’s the whole point of the CDC going after raw dairy: To destroy the raw dairy industry and force everyone to drink dirty, contaminated pasteurized milk that’s extracted from tortured cows.

Here are some other short videos you may want to view (WARNING):

Dairy Cow Abuse – “Mercy For Animals” hidden camera in New York:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdiwZKsrgdA

The disgusting treatment of (conventional) dairy cows:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzS8p727gvM

Dairy cows with injuries and infections:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrMj0oBdyWs

ABC Nightline – Dairy farm abuse:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIRshcfNLDk

So get it through your heads, folks: If you buy pasteurized, homogenized milk, you are supporting an industry of filth, torture, infected animals and dirty, dirty milk.

Blood, pus, bacteria and fecal matter

The reason all that milk has to be pasteurized is because it’s strongly contaminated with:

• blood
• pus
• bacteria
• fecal matter

In addition, conventional dairy cows are:

• Pumped full of bovine growth hormones
• Fed masses of antibiotics
• Fed tons of GMOs such as corn and soy
• Heavily contaminated with chemical pesticides

That’s what you get when you buy “Pasteurized” milk. Plus the feces in the milk, of course.

The cleanest milk in the world? RAW, fresh milk!

You want to see a super clean dairy operation? Go to a raw dairy farm and check out their operation. It’s the cleanest, most pristine dairy operation you’ll ever find. And why? Because it has to be. If you want to produce clean, fresh dairy without pasteurization, you have to run a super clean facility with healthy cows, stringent cleanliness practices and a commitment to producing wholesome food.

Only raw milk dairies have this kind of commitment to cleanliness.

View this powerful comparison between pasteurized milk and raw milk:
http://organicpastures.com/whyraw.html

In fact, if you took a gallon of unpasteurized milk from a conventional dairy and you compared it to a gallon of unpasteurized milk from a quality-certified raw milk dairy, I have no doubt you would find that the conventional dairy has at least 150 times the level of blood, pus, feces and dangerous bacteria (if not more).

In contrast, raw milk from a reputable dairy operation such as Organic Pastures (www.OrganicPastures.com) is the cleanest milk on the planet, bar none. Sure, it has friendly bacteria in it, but that bacteria is good for you — it’s probiotics. The CDC, of course, is so clueless about infectious disease that they hate ALL bacteria and want to destroy them all with chemicals or heat.

The CDC won’t dare discuss any of this, however. Instead, the CDC has resorted to what can only be called a raw milk fear mongering campaign using the exact same tactic they used to promote vaccine sales by pushing false swine flu fear.

The only thing dirtier than pasteurized milk, it seems, is the CDC itself, which has degraded from a once-respected group of actual scientists to a cabal of junk science fear mongerers  who drop trow and bend over for Big Business (Big Pharma, Big Dairy, etc.) at every opportunity. Instead of doing something important to stop the spread of infectious disease (like promoting vitamin D, immune-boosting nutrition and improved sanitation), the CDC is now a total sellout to the interests of the corporate giants who feed us filth and call it food.

So it’s no surprise to see the CDC promoting pasteurized milk — the very product whose digestive enzymes have been destroyed so that it causes allergic reactions in those who consume it.

Pasteurized, homogenized milk also promotes heart disease, obesity, autoimmune disorders, constipation, sinus congestion and many other chronic health conditions. It is the perfect food for the uninformed masses who the U.S. government seems to be trying to keep in a state of lifelong disease and medical enslavement.

Keep reading NaturalNews to learn more about what’s wrong with conventional pasteurized dairy products. We’re working on several articles covering this topic.

And remember:

Pasteurized milk is so disgustingly dirty that if they didn’t kill everything in it with heat, the liquid would probably kill YOU.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/21/feds-fresh-milk-150-t…

http://organicpastures.com/

www.RealMilk.com

www.WestonAPrice.org

Source: Natural News -

Author: Mike Adams

Health Benefits of Phytochemicals – Are You getting Enough?

Phytonutrients, the chemicals that help plants defend against environmental challenges, such as damage from pests or ultraviolet light, appear to provide humans with protection as well. Mounting research shows their effectiveness in preventing and treating a range of conditions including everything from cancer and heart disease to diabetes and high blood pressure. But current law dictates that if anyone advertises health benefits without FDA approval, it is automatically considered an illegal health claim, even for everyday foods, such as walnuts.

Phytochemicals are thought to be responsible for much of the disease protection granted by diets high in fruits, vegetables, beans, cereals, and plant-based beverages such as tea and wine, according to a University of California, Davis report (http://chnr.ucdavis.edu/content/Fac…).

Although it has become widely accepted that a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, legumes, and grains reduces the risk of cancer, heart disease, and other illnesses, scientists have only recently begun researching the effects of the different phytonutrients those foods contain.

Previous evidence has come from observations of cultures that eat plant-based diets and have lower rates of certain types of cancer and heart disease. The relatively low rates of breast and endometrial cancers in some Asian cultures, for example, are credited partly to dietary habits. These cancers are much more common in the United States, possibly because the typical American diet is higher in fat and lower in fruits, vegetables, legumes and grains, according to American Cancer Society.

Many experts suggest that people can reduce their risk of cancer significantly by eating the foods that contain phytonutrients, according to American Cancer Society (http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/Tre…). Evidence shows that they may work by helping to prevent the formation of potential carcinogens, blocking the action of carcinogens on their target organs or tissue, or acting on cells to suppress cancer development.

Research suggests that flavonoids, the most diverse group of phytochemicals, may be a key phytochemical group that contributes to the reduced mortality rates observed in people consuming high levels of plant-based foods, according to the UC Davis report. In the Zutphen Elderly Study, myocardial infarction was found to decrease as falvonoid intake increased. Similarly, the Seven Countries Study, which compared the diets of men living in various Western countries including the U.S., suggested that consumption of flavonoids was responsible for 25 percent of the observed difference in mortality rates in the different countries.

University of Minnesota Hormel Institute researchers say phytonutrients could be used in effective cancer prevention therapy, so much so that they eventually aim to develop phytochemical-derived anticancer drugs, Dr. Sigang Dong told The Austin Daily Herald (http://www.austindailyherald.com/20…).

“In the future, personalized prevention methods using photochemical could have a crucial role in cancer prevention, especially in high-risk populations,” Dong said. “We will continue our rigorous research in identifying molecular targets and aim for conducting human studies with phytocehemicals – this would provide the path for an enhanced approach to personalized cancer prevention.”

FDA monopoly on health

Evidence favoring the health benefits of phytonutrients is growing every day, so much so that the biotech industry is already researching transgenic and non-transgenic ways to vastly increase the phytonutrient levels in plants that already contain high levels of the chemicals, according the 2009 book Recent Advances in Biotechnology (http://books.google.com/books?id=Sl…).

Yet, even as the science bounds ahead, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration refuses to allow food producers to put the facts on their labels.

The agency has structured the rules to categorize anything that treats or prevents disease as a drug. If you eat walnuts, which are shown to lower high cholesterol — according to Natural News, the FDA declares your walnuts to be a drug. Furthermore, if anything is advertised as providing health benefits without FDA approval, it’s automatically considered to be an “unapproved drug”, even if it’s a common, everyday food like walnuts, cherries, grapes or orange (http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Enforcemen…).

Shockingly, even references to peer-reviewed scientific studies are a no-no without FDA permission. So if you sell walnuts, and your website merely links to such studies, then you can be threatened, arrested, imprisoned and fined millions of dollars by the FDA for selling “unapproved drugs.” (http://www.naturalnews.com/027750_G…)

The Alliance for Natural Health, a non-profit organization committed to protecting integrative medicine, is fighting these FDA mandates with The Free Speech About Science Act. The congressional bill, HR 4913, is designed to stop government censorship of truthful, scientific health claims about natural foods and herbs, and restore free speech to natural health (http://www.naturalnews.com/028879_c…). If the bill passes, it will allow manufacturers and producers to reference peer-reviewed, scientific studies that highlight the health benefits of food products that they grow or sell.

Understanding Phytonutrients

Some researchers estimate up to 40,000 phytonutrients will someday be fully catalogued and understood. In just the last 30 years, many hundreds of these compounds have been identified and are currently being investigated for their health-promoting qualities, according to The George Mateljan Foundation for the World’s Healthiest Foods.

Phytonutrients are classified by their chemical structure and categorized into families based on the similarities in their structures. The phenols, or polyphenols is one family that has received attention in the scientific literature. They include the anthocyanidins, which give blueberries and grapes their dark blue and purple color, and the catechins, found in tea and wine, which provide the bitter taste as well as the tawny coloring in these foods (http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?…).

Flavonoids are also commonly considered phenols, although the term “flavonoids” can refer to many phytonutrients. Isoflavones are usually categorized as members of this family. They are found in soy, kudzu, red clover, flax and rye, and have been researched extensively for their ability to protect against hormone-dependent cancers, such as breast cancer.

Other phytonutrients include the organosulfur compounds, such as the glucosinolates and indoles from brassica vegetables like broccoli, and the allylic sulfides from garlic and onions, all of which have been found to support our ability to detoxify noxious foreign compounds like pesticides and other environmental toxins.

Integrating phytonutrients into your diet

A recommended intake of phytochemicals does not exist today, according to the UC Davis report. The Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes and its Panel on Dietary Antioxidants and Related Compounds chose not to create a Dietary Reference Intake due to the lack of food composition data and a true understanding of the absorption and metabolism of phytonutrients. In the absence of such a DRI, many health authorities such as the American Cancer Society and the American Heart Association recommend consuming a diet high in fruits and vegetables to
ensure that people get an adequate amount of phytochemical compounds.

Available scientific evidence does not support claims that taking phytochemical supplements is as helpful as consuming the fruits, vegetables, beans, and grains from which they are taken, according to the American Cancer Society (http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/Tre…). So, the best choice, according to O Magazine, is to head to the local farmers’ market for the season’s freshest produce packed with those precious chemicals. Typically, fruit travels more than 675 miles before hitting your table and it is leeching phytonutrients all the way.

And don’t forget to look beyond produce to the other phytonutrient-dense foods like beans and spices.

Beans are a miracle food, according to The Daily Times. They lower cholesterol, regulate blood sugar and insulin production, promote digestive health, and protect against cancer. If you think of fiber, protein, and antioxidants and immediately think whole grains, meat, and fruit, think again – beans offer all three in a single package.

Turmeric, ginger, coriander, cumin and fennel are just a few of the spices containing phytonutrients, according to The Detroit News. Cinnamon has been found to help control blood sugar and improve insulin resistance in diabetics. Paprika may help raise good cholesterol, and ginger, coriander and cumin may promote healthy digestion. (http://www.detnews.com/article/2011…).

Sources for this article include:

http://www.naturalnews.com/028879_c…
http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Enforcemen…
http://www.austindailyherald.com/20…
http://www.oprah.com/health/Eat-Sea…
http://www.organiclifestylemagazine…
http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/Tre…
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/defaul…
http://chnr.ucdavis.edu/content/Fac…
http://www.detnews.com/article/2011…
http://books.google.com/books?id=Sl…
http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?…

Article by: Neev M. Arnell, Natural News

Go Organic & Healthy for Mothers Day

Hey guys.

Do you have your gifts ready for Mothers Day?

One of my pet peeves is getting a gift that is wasteful and that I know I will never use.  But every year people spend millions of dollars on useless gifts when they can be spending the same amount of money on healthy alternatives.

So this Mothers day I set out to offer some of the organic creations I make and sell locally.  I plan to eventually have a full online and local shop that will incorporate all my health & wellness expertise amongst other things.

But for now you can check out a few of these organic gifts by clicking on the picture below.

I have some really nice organic teas, organic herbal eye masks, organic lip balms, organic facial washes, handmade soaps, disposable paper tea filters, herbal baths and more to be added daily.

Blessings,

LCO

 

 

 

Previous Older Entries

About LCO

La Chica Organica is a fun loving mom of 3 beautiful children that enjoys sharing life building truth as a Health and Wellness Educator. Her passion is also seen in the creation of her own line of organic herbal products for her family. Quite often, she is asked to share with moms about the value of using herbs for healing everyday ailments. Part of her mission is to teach people all around the world about optimal health through proper nutrition and help parents make wiser food choices for their children. Her own life testimony of her families’ transition from bad health to better health has helped many families on their way to renewed wellness. To schedule a personal health and wellness at home visit or to invite her to speak at your church or office please email LaChicaOrganica@gmail.com

Disclaimer & Site Info

All content written by la Chica Organica™ is protected by copywrite law.©

The information provided here at La Chica Organica’s™ blog site is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other health care professional. You should not use the information here for self-diagnosis or to replace any prescriptive medication. You should consult with a healthcare professional before starting any diet, exercise or supplementation program, before taking any medication, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem, suffer from allergies, are pregnant or nursing.

These Statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. The content in this site is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

Any views or opinions written in this blog should not be taken as fact or professional advice. If you choose to use my advice, tips, techniques, and recommendations, and are injured, I will not be held responsible. Absolutely no content is to be taken as legal, medical, nutritional, psychological, or psychiatric advice. If you need professional advice, you should consult a licensed professional as mentioned above.

All content written here is based on years of my own research, experience, and personal opinions and I will not be held responsible for any decision that you make concerning your own health, food choices, exercise choices, or life choices; so please act wisely.